Abstract
"Anti-order" is an important theoretical category in Chinese traditional culture, often compared with the category of "fro-order." As the categories of "anti-order" and "fro-order" develop, two value orientations are formed in the process, that is, the orientation that favors "fro-order" over "anti-order" and that puts more merit on "anti-order" than "fro-order." The preference to "anti-order" has exerted greater influence and given rise to the concept of "anti-order writing" in theoretical criticism of classical Chinese literature. It is a common aesthetic aspiration in literary criticism of the Qing Dynasty that values the "anti-order." The Tongcheng school, for instance, makes detailed comments on the use of the "anti-order writing" through anthologies and commentaries to emphasize its important meaning. Their creative interpretation by means of metaphor enriches the criticism of the anti-order writing. Tongcheng scholars' criticism of anti-order writing is a concrete reflection of their literary thought. Moreover, their works not only reflect the profound understanding of Tongcheng school's creative view on anti-order writing, but also embody the mindset of favoring the aesthetics of twists over smoothness.
First Page
198
Last Page
209
Recommended Citation
Yang, Xinping. 2021. "Tongcheng School's Criticism of Anti-order Writing: On Annotative Criticism in Classical Prose Anthologies." Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art 41, (3): pp.198-209. https://tsla.researchcommons.org/journal/vol41/iss3/19
